Two: The B2B BNPL Engine Quietly Rebuilding Trade Credit Infrastructure

AI Marketing Banner

FUNDING & GROWTH TRAJECTORY

Two has raised a cumulative $200M across 4 known funding rounds, with the most recent raise in July 2025 categorized as a "Series Unknown." Despite a $0M disclosure in this latest round, earlier reports confirm a €18M Series A led by Investinor. Implication: stealth prefers opacity at the late stage, hinting at strategic investor participation or debt components off-record.

The €18M public-facing Series A closed in March 2023 catalyzed partnerships and product expansions into the UK and Nordics. Post-funding, Two launched integrations with Santander and Allianz Trade, indicative of a capital-efficient infrared approach. Implication: funding was converted into distribution leverage, not merely burn runway.

Comparatively, peers like ePaylater have disclosed smaller, earlier rounds ($16M total), suggesting Two is punching above capital class. Unlike EBANX, whose cross-border licenses demand higher fundraising, Two’s localized B2B wedge allowed it to reach similar product breadth at lower cost. Opportunity: deeper penetration before saturation capital hits.

  • Raised €18M Series A in 2023, bringing capital to $200M total
  • Latest round in 2025 undisclosed at $0M—may mask internal transaction or debt
  • Number of investors: 14, including Alliance Ventures and Arkwright X
  • Spike in hiring around B2B ops and capital markets post-raise

Implication: funding converted to enterprise traction, not just headcount inflation.

PRODUCT EVOLUTION & ROADMAP HIGHLIGHTS

Two's product began with core BNPL infrastructure for B2B e-commerce. The initial offering automated instant credit decisions using Delphi and Frida, their AI-powered engines. Frida, notably, processes over 5,000 transactions per second and claims 97% fraud loss reduction. Implication: this isn’t just delayed invoicing, it's re-architecting trust itself.

The roadmap evolved to include APIs, role-based access, plug-ins for Shopify, Magento, and support for in-store B2B purchases. Merchant onboarding time dropped under 30 seconds, while approval windows tightened to ~2 seconds. Implication: the UX isn't layered on credit—it is credit.

One user story: Eplehuset, an Apple reseller, integrates Two for in-store net terms, increasing cart values with minimal checkout friction. Implication: net terms isn't just an accounting offer—it becomes a conversion asset on the physical floor.

  • Started with BNPL → expanded to credit automation and collections linkages
  • Plugin integrations: WooCommerce, Crystallize, Magento, Optimizely
  • Supports in-store transactions with real-time approvals
  • Claims 20% conversion lift, 60% AOV increase for integrated merchants

Opportunity: increased AOV makes this a revenue center, not cost line, for merchants.

TECH-STACK DEEP DIVE

The front end is built using React and jQuery—React enables complex UIs and dashboards, but jQuery’s presence suggests legacy modules or third-party dependencies. Cloudfront, Cloudflare, and AWS Global Accelerator form the latency-reducing trio offering global reach. Implication: stack designed for scale, although some tech debt lingers.

Backend infra relies on AWS (Virginia, Sydney, Oregon) and Google Cloud, offering geographic redundancy. API architecture leverages AWS Lambda for serverless, and nginx for request routing. Security via HSTS, SSL by default, and DNSSEC reflects maturity. Risk: React + jQuery risk bloated scripts unless minified and split strategically.

For compliance, they use DMARC, SPF, and have bug bounty presence—a clear nod to enterprise readiness. Postmark powers transactional email delivery and Hubspot handles marketing analytics and conversations. Implication: deliberate bifurcation between operational and marketing tech pipelines emphasizes API-first core.

  • Frontend: React + Webflow (CMS), GSAP, jQuery → performance trade-offs
  • Infra: AWS (Lambda, S3, EC2), Cloudflare, CDN.js, Cloudfront
  • Security: HSTS preload, DNSSEC, DMARC Quarantine, Bug Bounty
  • DevOps tools: Google Tag Manager, Hubspot Forms, Zendesk for support

Opportunity: removing jQuery and deferring complex animations could boost Web Vitals.

DEVELOPER EXPERIENCE & COMMUNITY HEALTH

There’s no public GitHub, Discord or LaunchWeek activity cited, suggesting a private, enterprise-first developer motion. This contrasts heavily with fully open platforms like Firebase or Appwrite that rely on OSS distribution. Risk: developer advocacy gap may slow adoption by integrators.

Two maintains an open API portal and public documentation inferred by verified links. Plug-ins for low/ no-code platforms de-risk integration yet don’t substitute for sandboxed SDKs. Implication: developer journey may stall pre-sale due to insufficient exposure, making sales cycles founder-dependent.

By contrast, PlanetScale and Firebase have outbound open-source momentum—GitHub stars plus Slack/Discord growth offer a proxy funnel Two lacks. Opportunity: investing in docs, SDKs, and GitHub presence could improve partner velocity and CAC/LTV multiples.

  • No GitHub/public repo visibility; closed-source infrastructure
  • API documentation linked on dev site, verified via metadata
  • Limited public evangelism: no Discord, blog traffic driven via SEO
  • Contrast: Firebase’s GitHub has 18k+ stars vs. Two’s zero OSS footprint

Opportunity: launch developer hub to bootstrap long-tail adoption and reduce sales dependency.

MARKET POSITIONING & COMPETITIVE MOATS

Two's wedge is clear: AI-driven net term decisions for B2B sellers without traditional credit bureaus. Delphi and Frida enable this edge—giving them 7x higher credit limits and 75% lower credit management cost than alternatives. Implication: they aren’t competing on underwriting—they’re rewriting it.

EBANX plays in cross-border payments, ePaylater addresses SME-level needs, but Two services mid-market to enterprise with regulatory and technical breadth unmatched by peers. Lock-in comes from their merchant-side integrations and API role-based controls. Implication: those who integrate Two fully won’t easily port to rivals without systemic changes.

Differentiators extend to fraud models: Frida, clocking >5,000 tx/sec, drives real-time approval confidence. Opportunity: as embedded finance saturates, credibility anchored in antifraud may be the moat buyers trust.

  • Delphi & Frida engines: AI credit scoring and fraud mitigation in 2 seconds
  • 7x higher limit vs. bureau-based models (source: internal data)
  • Role-based API access for enterprise IT compliance
  • Reduction in fraud losses: 97%

Opportunity: white-labeling models for banks could create compliance-aligned platform revenue.

GO-TO-MARKET & PLG FUNNEL ANALYSIS

Top CTAs on Two's website are “Book a Demo,” “Contact Sales,” and “Sign Up” — all enterprise-grade signals. This contrasts Firebase’s pure PLG funnel with code embedded on first visit. Risk: friction in reaching live environments could damage discovery-fueled growth.

Traffic ranks (#814,354) and MoM growth (+2.07%) are modest. Demo funnel hinges on content as primary magnet; blog subdomain captures interest around “order-to-cash”, “trade credit” keywords. Implication: SEO⁠—not virality⁠—is the top of funnel, rendering marketing sensitive to organic traffic dips.

Activation friction includes unclear pricing tiers and manual API pathing. Self-serve onboarding isn't yet visible, with heavy lean on sales engineering. Opportunity: PLG supplement could nurture long-tail buyers and reduce dependency on partnership sales.

  • Top-funnel: content-driven with 44K backlinks and 625 referring domains
  • Conversion: demo-booking model with no PLG or public sandbox
  • Traffic: ~24K monthly visits, up 1585% YoY (peak July 2025)
  • No app store presence—mobile conversion via web portal only

Risk: volume bottlenecks if top-funnel SEO stalls or demo handling saturates.

PRICING & MONETISATION STRATEGY

Two doesn’t offer public pricing—our estimates point to per-transaction models (~$X–$Y), with discounts tied to volume. Par for B2B BNPL, but hard to benchmark without rate cards. Implication: price sensitivity shifts to value proof early in onboarding cycle.

Lack of published tiers increases friction for mid-market buyers who expect enterprise transparency akin to Stripe or Brex. That also complicates PLG initiatives. Risk: price opacity may depress signup momentum outside of partner-referred deals.

Revenue leakage likely flows via uncollected dunning cycles or underpriced high-risk accounts. Even with a 97% fraud reduction claim, recourse or reconciliation overheads (see Trustpilot reviews) suggest some accounts are resource-draining. Opportunity: introduce variable pricing for high-friction verticals to reabsorb operating margin.

  • No public pricing page: demo-only conversion
  • Revenue = transaction fee x volume; margin from fraud savings
  • Estimated price range: aligns with peers at $0.50–$2.00 per $1000
  • Enterprise tiers likely customized for partners (e.g., Santander)

Opportunity: publish indicative pricing to unlock mid-market self-qualification.

SEO & WEB-PERFORMANCE STORY

Authority score sits at 35 with 62K referring domains, but performance score clocks in at 50/100—dragged by React+Webflow render bloat. Implication: mobile-first experience is likely suffering, possibly impacting conversion-to-demo rates.

Organic traffic surged from sub-2K levels to 20K in July 2025 (+1585% YoY) due to SERP snippet optimizations on “what is trade credit” and “b2b payments.” Blog posts like “accounts receivable financing” drove spikes. Risk: dependency on a few long-tail keywords introduces volatility.

Dominant backlinks sources show healthy diversification (42K+ follow links), but lack of site speed tuning muddies ROI. Opportunity: LCP and CLS optimization via async image loading and script deferral could lift Web Vitals scores and downstream SEO rank.

  • Total traffic: 24,716/month (as of latest), up from ~1.5K in 2024
  • Backlinks: 44,222 with 625 referring domains
  • Authority Score: 35 (median for mid-stage fintech)
  • Performance score: 50/100; React + Webflow render stack

Opportunity: optimize technical SEO and Web Vitals to raise ranks and reduce bounce.

CUSTOMER SENTIMENT & SUPPORT QUALITY

Two's Trustpilot score stands at 3.8 from 73 reviews, with themes of poor invoice allocation, email-only support, and automation fatigue. Complaint cluster: delayed statement generation causes payment errors, leading to aggressive dunning. Risk: misfires here cut against value prop of “streamlined order-to-cash.”

14-day average to reply to negative reviews is long for fintech standards, compared to 48-72 hours seen in peers like Revolut or Klarna. Opportunity: triage playbooks and phone-enabled Tier 2 support could recover ~0.3–0.5 Trustpilot score differential.

Not all feedback is negative—many 5-star reviews cite fast onboarding and helpful reps, especially for integrations. That said, praise points to people, not platform UI. Implication: high-touch hides UX debt under the surface.

  • TrustPilot: 3.8 ⭐ (73 reviews), free-tier support; long reply time
  • Complaints: payment misallocation, delayed credits, no phone line
  • Positive mentions: fast support by reps like Salman and Joachim
  • Net Promoter Score (inferred): Likely 15–25 for current cohort

Opportunity: upgrade UX for invoice visibility; introduce live CSAT and phone fallback.

SECURITY, COMPLIANCE & ENTERPRISE READINESS

The presence of HSTS, DNSSEC, SPF, and DMARC with quarantine suggests fundamental controls are in place. Verified DNS via Google and AWS regions across EU/US support GDPR alignment. Implication: posture is enterprise-ready—but opacity persists on third-party certifications like SOC 2.

Public indicators like bug bounty and API dev portal are rare among peers this size, signaling confidence and compliance diligence. However, no pen-test publication or proof of AI audit has been disclosed. Risk: growing scrutiny around AI in credit decisions means legal gaps could become sales blockers by 2026.

Fraud engine Frida is their weapon—but also risk center. Without explainability frameworks or bias testing, Two could run afoul of upcoming EU AI regs. Opportunity: AI audit and documentation layer could preemptively derisk Tier 1 partner scaling.

  • Security stack: HSTS preload, bug bounty, DNSSEC, SPF, verified SSL
  • Compliance: no public SOC2/HIPAA claim yet noted
  • Fraud engine (Frida) lacks public explainability documentation
  • Data residency: US+EU compliant via AWS/GCP region location

Opportunity: early-stage AI governance investment could unlock enterprise deals.

HIRING SIGNALS & ORG DESIGN

Team has scaled to 51–100 headcount with ~21 in R&D (25.6%), making engineering the largest function. Active roles in operations, capital markets and talent. Implication: post-funding phase balancing infra innovation with regional ops scale.

Recent intern listings suggest cost-efficient path to localize in Swedish, Nordic territories. Compared to similar fintechs at funding-parity (e.g., Tymit or ePaylater), Two has a noticeably lean sales/CS team—a signal of over-weighted product or ops focus. Risk: under-investing in customer success may cap NPS and referrals.

Leadership includes Andreas Mjelde (Founder/CEO), and a co-founder-led CTO, hinting at close product-to-customer feedback loops. Implication: founder-primary org still shaping vision and forward motion.

  • Hiring in: Ops (Internships), People, Capital Markets
  • R&D: 25.6% of team, largest department
  • Leadership: founder-led, with multiple technical/business co-founders
  • Size: scaled to 51–100 in ~5 years post-2020

Opportunity: scale CS headcount and playbooks to meet mid-market SLAs.

PARTNERSHIPS, INTEGRATIONS & ECOSYSTEM PLAY

The strongest GTM accelerator lies in brand alliances: Two partners with Visa, Santander, ABN Amro, Eplehuset. These aren’t just logos—they reshape buyer trust at checkout. Implication: partner-recognition acts like conversion middleware.

Integration ecosystem spans Shopify, Magento, WooCommerce, Craft CMS, and Optimizely—de-risking onboarding for B2B merchants. Crystallize and Dynamicweb suggest a Nordic CMS skew. Opportunity: monetizing via certified plug-ins or ecosystem revenue shares grows LTV without support load.

Partner program details remain closed—no co-sell pages or ISV onboarding flows public. Contrast: Stripe or Brex explicitly court dev partners. Risk: opacity here slows ecosystem compounding.

  • Partners: Santander, Allianz, Visa, ABN Amro
  • Clients: Eplehuset, Rekki, Fleek, Komplett, NetOnNet
  • Plug-ins: WooCommerce, Shopify, Magento, Crystallize
  • Technical ecosystem: AWS, Google Cloud, Hubspot stack

Opportunity: open partner directory and enable SDK submission to scale leverage beyond direct sales.

Share this post

Research any Company for Free

Tap into live data across 100+ data points
Loading...